- "White Hat" hackers use their hacking skills to prevent malicious hacking.
- Justifications for Hacking
- Break ins alert the society to security breaches
- Idle Machines
- Social Protector
- Spafford focuses on the issue of data collection by companies, but there are other issues—e.g., freedom on the internet.
- (Not mentioned by Spafford) Protestor, civil disobedience, vigilante justice. [See Himma for a discussion]
- Wikileaks as engaging in hacktivisim. (If you don't know anything about Wikileaks, you can check our their website or the wikipedia page on them.)
- Note: I mention the "6-D's" they are consequences of digital media: denationalization, demassification, decentralization, despacialization, disintermediation, and disaggregation.
- Anonymous as hacktivists. Is Anonymous engaging in Civil Disobedience?
- Plus a bit about free speech and legal limits on it.
Sunday, February 21, 2016
Hacktivism--Wikileaks and Anonymous
The second installment of my lecture on Hacker Culture.
Hacker Culture
This is the first installment of a couple of video lectures on Hacker Culture.
Main Points
- With the rise of “networks” came people who could get “unauthorized” access to those networks. e.g., “Phone hackers.”
- Hacker culture, however, is broader than that. I would define it as using technological knowledge computers, and particularly computer networks, in ways outside of the law or everyday morality.
- Spafford a bit weak on ethics—but discusses the rationales from an ethical point of view, so I thought it would be helpful.
- Justifications for Hacking and Spafford's responses.
- Information wants to be free
- Spafford notes the drawbacks to open information, but fails to mention the drawbacks to secrecy and proprietary information.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)